08.03.2007, 19:36
noch zwei Meinungen:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2604214&C=asiapac">http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F= ... &C=asiapac</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/varyagtransform.htm">http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/va ... nsform.htm</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2604214&C=asiapac">http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F= ... &C=asiapac</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:Posted 03/07/07 08:58und
China Says Aircraft Carrier Possible By 2010: Paper
By REUTERS, HONG KONG
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/varyagtransform.htm">http://www.jeffhead.com/redseadragon/va ... nsform.htm</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:VARYAG TRANSFORMATION
INTO AN OPERATIONAL PLAN AIRCRAFT CARRIER