30.06.2015, 18:52
Bedenklich, insbesondere wenn man die zunehmende Proliferation russischer und chinesischer Systeme bedenkt:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sputniknews.com/military/20150628/1023948515.html">http://sputniknews.com/military/2015062 ... 48515.html</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sputniknews.com/military/20150628/1023948515.html">http://sputniknews.com/military/2015062 ... 48515.html</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:The US military has over-invested into weapons which work well for launching attacks on countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria but are quite ineffective for countries like Russia and China, media outlet Flight Global reports.
The US military has over-invested in purchasing short- range direct attack bombs and has under-invested in the long-range, stealth and precision-guided weapons.
Due to that, the United States cannot overcome the defenses of such countries as Russia, China and Iran. This conclusion was reached by experts of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, reports media outlet Flight Global.
Read more: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sputniknews.com/military/20150628/1023948515.html#ixzz3eZ6OU0rJ">http://sputniknews.com/military/2015062 ... z3eZ6OU0rJ</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:The report points out that from 2001 to 2014 the US Department of Defense bought 304,750 weapons for direct action with a radius of up to 50 lesions nautical miles (80.47 km), which accounted for 96% of all weapons purchase.
During the same period only 7109 long-range weapons were purchased. They can blast the radius of 400 nautical miles (643.74 kilometers).
Read more: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://sputniknews.com/military/20150628/1023948515.html#ixzz3eZ6SGxWQ">http://sputniknews.com/military/2015062 ... z3eZ6SGxWQ</a><!-- m -->