24.03.2020, 21:11
Ich glaube das ist noch nicht raus, aber deutlich kleiner und evtl. schneller als die bisherigen. Die Industrie springt auf den Zug anscheinend auch schon auf und bietet bewaffnete HSSV an:
https://www.navalnews.com/event-news/sna...-sna-2020/
Ich finde gerade einen älteren Artikel über die Zukunft vom USMC nicht. Ich denke hier geht es um höhere Geschwindikeiten, kleinere Verbände, vielleicht sogar schon Einzelfahrer und auch darum, dass man evtl. auch mal den Verlust eines Schiffes verkraften könnte.
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/20...al/160362/
"The operators teaming with those machines will also fight differently. The Marines, Berger said, are exploring new “methods like expeditionary advanced bases, small units, distributed, mobile, that can re-arm, refuel, sense forward, kill forward, and then move, all with a low signature"
"At the same time, we are under-invested in naval expeditionary capabilities and capacities that support fleet operations, including:
Unmanned lethal, low-cost, long-endurance combat aerial vehicles;
Unmanned lethal and non-lethal ground and amphibious vehicles;
Unmanned aerial, ground, surface, and underwater logistics vehicles/vessels;
Mobile and rapidly deployable rocket artillery and long-range precision-fires to include anti-ship missiles;
Mobile air defense and counter-precision guided missile systems, to include directed energy systems;
Loitering munitions;
Signature management;
Electronic warfare;
Expeditionary airfield capabilities and structure to support manned and unmanned aircraft and other systems from austere, minimally developed locations;
Offensive mining capabilities; and
Lethal and risk-worthy surface vessels to include large undersea vessels."
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/h...page=0%2C1 - siehe unten..
https://www.navalnews.com/event-news/sna...-sna-2020/
Ich finde gerade einen älteren Artikel über die Zukunft vom USMC nicht. Ich denke hier geht es um höhere Geschwindikeiten, kleinere Verbände, vielleicht sogar schon Einzelfahrer und auch darum, dass man evtl. auch mal den Verlust eines Schiffes verkraften könnte.
https://www.defenseone.com/technology/20...al/160362/
"The operators teaming with those machines will also fight differently. The Marines, Berger said, are exploring new “methods like expeditionary advanced bases, small units, distributed, mobile, that can re-arm, refuel, sense forward, kill forward, and then move, all with a low signature"
"At the same time, we are under-invested in naval expeditionary capabilities and capacities that support fleet operations, including:
Unmanned lethal, low-cost, long-endurance combat aerial vehicles;
Unmanned lethal and non-lethal ground and amphibious vehicles;
Unmanned aerial, ground, surface, and underwater logistics vehicles/vessels;
Mobile and rapidly deployable rocket artillery and long-range precision-fires to include anti-ship missiles;
Mobile air defense and counter-precision guided missile systems, to include directed energy systems;
Loitering munitions;
Signature management;
Electronic warfare;
Expeditionary airfield capabilities and structure to support manned and unmanned aircraft and other systems from austere, minimally developed locations;
Offensive mining capabilities; and
Lethal and risk-worthy surface vessels to include large undersea vessels."
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/h...page=0%2C1 - siehe unten..