03.12.2003, 11:41
Muahhaa
hab grad meinen Lieblingskandidaten entdeckt der umbedingt fuer die Demokraten bei den Wahlen antreten soll - Howard Dean.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000254.asp?cp1=1">http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000254.asp?cp1=1</a><!-- m -->
Vorallem wird er damit bei der amerikanischen Bevoelkerung ungemein punkten - vorallem bei den Hinterblieben des Anschlags aufs WTC.
Na was wird der Internationale Gerichtshof Bin Laden geben - 15 Jahre ? 20 ?
*ggg*
Achja der Typ hat sich auch vorm Vietnamkrieg gedrueckt - und sowas waere dann Oberbefehlshaber der Streitkraefte.
Hoffentlich stellen die Demokraten den auf - Bush muesste sich dann keine Sorgen machen um die Wiederwahl. :p
hab grad meinen Lieblingskandidaten entdeckt der umbedingt fuer die Demokraten bei den Wahlen antreten soll - Howard Dean.
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000254.asp?cp1=1">http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000254.asp?cp1=1</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:MATTHEWS: Who should try Osama bin Laden if we catch him? We or the World Court?Die Einstellung lob ich mir - klare Linie *fg*
DEAN: I don’t think it makes a lot of difference. I’m happy...
MATTHEWS: But who would you like to, if you were president of the United States, would you insist on us trying him, since he was involved in blowing up the World Trade Center, or would you let The Hague do it?
DEAN: You know, the truth is it doesn’t make a lot of difference to me as long as he is brought to justice. I think that’s the critical part of that.
MATTHEWS: How about Saddam Hussein? Should we try him in criminal and execute him...
DEAN: Again, we are allowing the Bosnian war criminals to be tried at The International Court in The Hague. That suits me fine. As long as they’re brought to justice and tried, and so far we haven’t had to have that discussion because the president has not been able to find either one of them.
Vorallem wird er damit bei der amerikanischen Bevoelkerung ungemein punkten - vorallem bei den Hinterblieben des Anschlags aufs WTC.
Na was wird der Internationale Gerichtshof Bin Laden geben - 15 Jahre ? 20 ?
*ggg*
Zitat:DEAN: Iran is a more complex problem because the problem support as clearly verifiable as it is in North Korea. Also, we have less-fewer levers much the key, I believe, to Iran is pressure through the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union is supplying much of the equipment that Iran, I believe, most likely is using to set itself along the path of developing nuclear weapons. We need to use that leverage with the Soviet Union and it may require us to buying the equipment the Soviet Union was ultimately going to sell to Iran to prevent Iran from them developing nuclear weapons. That is also a country that must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons much the key to all this is foresight. Let’s act now so we don’t have to have a confrontation which may result in force, which would be very disastrous in the case of North Korea and might be disastrous in the case of Iran.Mach dir nichts draus Dean - hab auch schon Deutsche getroffen die den Untergang der Sowjetunion nicht mitbekommen haben...
Achja der Typ hat sich auch vorm Vietnamkrieg gedrueckt - und sowas waere dann Oberbefehlshaber der Streitkraefte.
Hoffentlich stellen die Demokraten den auf - Bush muesste sich dann keine Sorgen machen um die Wiederwahl. :p
