24.01.2005, 22:12
Sorry, dann habe ich es falsch verstanden.
----------
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.spacedaily.com/news/iran-05b.html">http://www.spacedaily.com/news/iran-05b.html</a><!-- m -->
----------
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.spacedaily.com/news/iran-05b.html">http://www.spacedaily.com/news/iran-05b.html</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:US Faces Limited Military Options In Iran
Washington (AFP) Jan 22, 2005
With the bulk of its ground forces tied down in Iraq, the United States has compelling reasons to avoid military action against neighboring Iran even while stepping up pressure to halt its nuclear program, analysts said here.
"There are no good military options," James Carafano, a military expert with the conservative Heritage Foundation, said Friday.
The United States could launch pinpoint strikes on targets in Iran from US warships or from the air. But short of an imminent threat from nuclear armed Iranian missiles, any gain would likely be outweighed by the trouble Iran could cause US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, he said.
...
"In the case of the Iranian situation, I think everybody would be best suited by or best treated and dealt with if we could deal with it diplomatically," he said.
...
One reason is that the US military already has its hands full in Iraq, where 150,000 US troops are struggling to contain a predominantly Sunni insurgency.
A ground war with Iran would be unsustainable, Carafano said in an interview.
"We couldn't do another large scale ground operation without a major mobilization that would require mobilizing basically all of the national guard," he said.
"Even if we wanted to do that, it would be pretty obvious because it would take us months if not years to get the national guard up and ready to go."
Even a limited US attack on Iran, which shares a 1,450-kilometer (900-mile) open border with Iraq, would invite Tehran to use its influence among Iraq's Shiites to sabotage the separate peace US forces have enjoyed in southern Iraq. The same is true in Afghanistan, which has a 900-kilometer (560-mile) border with Iran.
"When you're trying to stabilize Iraq and you've got this long border between Iran and Iraq, and you're trying to keep the Iranians from interfering in Iraq so you can get the Iraq government up and running, you shouldn't be picking a war with the Iranians," said Carafano.
"It just doesn't make any sense from a geopolitical standpoint," he said.
...