12.10.2004, 14:45
@shahab - da hast irakische aktenn eingescannt die auch schon experten vorgelegt bekommen haben :baeh:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/8/112447.shtml">http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/8/112447.shtml</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/8/112447.shtml">http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/10/8/112447.shtml</a><!-- m -->
Zitat:Friday, Oct. 8, 2004 11:16 a.m. EDTUnd das Uran diente auch der Nahrungszubereitung wie :laugh:
No WMD Stockpiles in Iraq? Not Exactly ...
Is it really true that Saddam Hussein had no "stockpiles" of weapons of mass destruction before the U.S. invaded in March 2003?
Not exactly - at least not if one counts the 500 tons of uranium that the Iraqi dictator kept stored at his al Tuwaitha nuclear weapons development plant.
The press hasn't made much of Saddam's 500-ton uranium stockpile, downplaying the story to such an extent that most Americans aren't even aware of it.
But it's been reported - albeit in a by-the-way fashion - by the New York Times and a handful of other media outlets. And one of Saddam's nuclear scientists, Jaffar Dhia Jaffar, admitted to the BBC earlier this year, "We had 500 tons of yellow cake [uranium] in Baghdad."
Surely 500 tons of anything qualifies as a "stockpile." And press reports going back more than a decade give no indication that weapons inspectors had any idea the Iraqi dictator had amassed such a staggering amount of nuke fuel until the U.S. invaded.
...