25.04.2025, 22:59
Ist nicht so klar, ob es tatsächlich Rechtsbeugung ist.
Aber:
Quelle
Zitat:The Supremacy Clause and other authorities require state and local actors to
comply with the Executive Branch's immigration enforcement initiatives.
Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing, and
otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands and
requests pursuant to, for example, the President's extensive Article II
authority with respect to foreign affairs and national security, the
Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Alien Enemies Act. The U.S.
Attorney's Offices and litigating components of the Department of Justice
shall investigate incidents involving any such misconduct for potential
prosecution, including for obstructing federal functions in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 371, and violations of other statutes, such as 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324,
1373.
Aber:
Zitat:This section threatens sanctuary jurisdictions with various legal
actions. It makes some sweeping claims that misstate the law, such
as the first sentence which erroneously claims that state and local
actors have to comply with immigration enforcement initiatives.
The U.S. Supreme Court has clearly held that the federal
government can’t require states or localities to use their resources to
enforce federal programs, such as immigration.8
This section also directs US federal prosecutors and other DOJ
divisions to investigate incidents of resistance to federal
immigration enforcement, including but not limited to federal
crimes of conspiracy and harboring. This is not limited or specific
to local governments or sanctuary policies, but could also
potentially apply to organizations or individuals. This section
provides motivation for the DOJ to focus prosecutions on
immigration advocates and activists for their work.
Quelle