(Europa) The Royal Navy
Tja, es scheint als ob es momentan keine wirklichen Absichten gibt den T45 mit TLAM oder einer 155 mm Kanone auszurüsten, dabei ist jedoch zu erwähnen, dass sie sich darüber Gedanken machen.Ich denke irgendwann wird es klappen.




<!-- w --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.parliament.the-statio...html_sbhd6">www.parliament.the-statio...html_sbhd6</a><!-- w -->


Zitat:Type 45 Destroyers

Dr. Julian Lewis: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what increase in capability would result from the upgrading of the gun turret on a Type 45 destroyer to house (a) a 127 mm and (b) a 155 mm gun, instead of a standard 115mm gun. [158141]



Mr. Ingram [holding answer 4 March 2004]: The overall capability offered by the Type 45 destroyer's gun is not related simply to the calibre of the barrel, but to the ammunition which could be used.

The standard 115 mm (4.5) gun is capable of delivering conventional munitions to a range of up to 27 km. 127 mm and 155 mm guns would be capable of firing munitions to a range of 75–80 km. They would also be capable of firing modern guided munitions and, in the case of the 155 mm gun, these would be considerably heavier than the 115 mm gun's conventional munitions.

The design of the Type 45 includes space and weight margins which would allow for the fitting of an improved Medium Range Gun, should such a requirement emerge. There is no such requirement at present. In the case of a 155 mm gun, this would also depend on the maturity of its technology, as there are no such naval guns yet in service world-wide.
www.parliament.the-statio...html_sbhd4
Zitat:Dr. Julian Lewis: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) for what reason it is not proposed to arm the new Type 45 destroyers with Tomahawk cruise missiles; [158139]


(2) how many Tomahawk cruise missiles he estimates could be mounted on a Type 45 destroyer. [158140]


Mr. Ingram [holding answer 4 March 2004]: The principal role of the Type 45 destroyer will be Anti-Air Warfare. There is currently no requirement for the Type 45 to be fitted with Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAM). If a requirement for TLAM arises in future, the Type 45 has been designed with substantial space and weight margins to enable its capability to be upgraded through life. We currently estimate that up to 16 TLAM missiles could be mounted on a Type 45 Destroyer.
Zitieren


Nachrichten in diesem Thema
The Royal Navy - von Rob - 24.08.2003, 10:18
RE: The Royal Navy - von Vanitas - 17.11.2016, 08:21
RE: The Royal Navy - von Schneemann - 11.03.2017, 10:47
RE: The Royal Navy - von Schneemann - 30.04.2017, 10:08
RE: The Royal Navy - von Rob - 30.06.2017, 11:11
Testfahrt HMS Queen Elizabeth - von PKr - 26.07.2017, 00:36
HMS Queen Elizabeth - von PKr - 15.08.2017, 15:07
RE: HMS Queen Elizabeth - von Seafire - 17.08.2017, 08:51
RE: HMS Queen Elizabeth - von PKr - 17.08.2017, 20:49
RE: The Royal Navy - von Schneemann - 10.09.2017, 13:29
RE: The Royal Navy - von Seafire - 18.10.2017, 09:29
RE: The Royal Navy - von JSS - 18.10.2017, 15:33
RE: The Royal Navy - von PKr - 12.02.2019, 16:40
RE: The Royal Navy - von Schneemann - 15.12.2019, 17:51
RE: The Royal Navy - von Seafire - 15.12.2019, 20:11
RE: The Royal Navy - von Superkinger - 26.07.2020, 17:57
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 30.08.2023, 18:07
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 28.10.2023, 09:37
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 18.11.2023, 17:12
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 01.12.2023, 16:28
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 06.01.2024, 16:15
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 07.01.2024, 15:44
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 20.01.2024, 14:53
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 21.01.2024, 14:20
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 05.02.2024, 14:28
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 21.02.2024, 14:55
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 29.03.2024, 16:14
RE: The Royal Navy - von Skywalker - 16.05.2024, 20:35
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 02.06.2024, 14:46
RE: The Royal Navy - von voyageur - 30.10.2024, 16:04
[Kein Betreff] - von Mondgesicht - 23.10.2010, 12:43
[Kein Betreff] - von Mondgesicht - 23.10.2010, 13:53
[Kein Betreff] - von PKr - 25.10.2010, 10:27
[Kein Betreff] - von fazer600 - 20.01.2011, 23:10
[Kein Betreff] - von Erich - 20.01.2011, 23:25
[Kein Betreff] - von Venturus - 20.01.2011, 23:38
[Kein Betreff] - von spooky - 20.01.2011, 23:50

Gehe zu: