Usa vs. Syrien
Die USA sind nicht auf alle möglichen Szenarien gefasst, da es nur sehr wenige Szenarien gibt, die den USA nicht erheblich schaden. Siehe dazu auch:

Zitat:Published on April 30, 2013
Toxic Syria – OpEd
By Alan Caruba
...
Syria is a rat’s nest even if the U.S. had the ability to identify who among the opposition to support. Then there is the question, if the opposition were to prevail, whether that would encourage elements of the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda to overthrow the Jordanian monarchy, leaving Israel even more vulnerable. It would not surprise me to see Israeli forces join with the Jordanians to sustain the monarchy.

After the United States withdrawal from Iraq it has been experiencing an increased level of internal conflict as the Sunnis seek to punish the Shiites who replaced their control under Saddam. Bombings are a daily event. Scheduled to leave Afghanistan in 2014, the U.S. can ill afford the cost of a military in volvement in Syria, nor can the European member nations of NATO. The United Nations, as always, is totally useless. Their so-called peacekeeping forces have all abandoned Syria, exiting via Israel.

The human toll is appalling, but there are few good reasons for the U.S. and others to be drawn into the Syrian conflict. If Bashar al-Assad survives, he will still be an ally of Russia and Iran. Lebanon will still be a Syrian satellite. It would take years to rebuild the nation reducing a military threat to Israel.
...
If al-Qaeda gains access to Syria’s stores of poison gas, no city in Am erica would be immune from an al Qaeda attack using it.
...
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.eurasiareview.com/30042013-toxic-syria-oped/">http://www.eurasiareview.com/30042013-toxic-syria-oped/</a><!-- m -->
Zitieren


Nachrichten in diesem Thema

Gehe zu: