Israel-Palästina

[ThomasWach]

Oh, oh, oh... ach nee...
Die UNWRA hält sich nicht mehr an die US-Politik und ihre Maximen.
Und es ist doch allgemein bekannt, dass die USA in diesem Konflikt die purste und reinste Manifestation der Neutralität und der Äquidistanz zu Konfliktparteien an den Tag legt....
:roll:

Die UNWRA hilft den Palästinensern. Dass dabei die UNWRA keine Hilfs- und "Vasallen"-Funktion der Nah Ost-Politik der USA übernimmt, kann schon mal bei UN-Institutionen passieren....


Edit:

Can Obama Broker Middle East Peace?
By Scott MacLeod/Cairo Sunday, Jan. 25, 2009

(...)
Most important, however, a new U.S. Middle East policy needs to change America's approach to the Arab-Israeli conflict. With all the rhetorical attention U.S. presidents have given the peace process, Obama could be forgiven for assuming that America has long been doing its best against overwhelming odds. But that's not how people in the region see it. A new U.S. policy should be based on reasserting four principles that have been largely ignored:

— the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the region's core problem;
— ending the conflict is an urgent priority for regional and global stability;
— "honest-broker" diplomacy by the U.S. is essential to mediating peace;
— a peace settlement must equitably address Palestinian as well as Israeli needs and interests.

The last time those principles guided U.S. efforts in the Middle East was during the presidecy of George H.W. Bush, who ejected Saddam Hussein from Kuwait and then convened the Madrid peace conference that paved the way for the Oslo Agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush each dallied until their final year in office before becoming engaged at all in mediating a final peace settlement, and even then, their efforts were viewed across the Arab world as too biased towards Israel to be effective.
(...)

Quelle:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0...59,00.html